# Star

False-color imagery of the Sun, a G-type main-sequence star, the closest to Earth

A star is a luminous sphere of plasma held together by its own gravity. The nearest star to Earth is the Sun. Many other stars are visible to the naked eye from Earth during the night, appearing as a multitude of fixed luminous points in the sky due to their immense distance from Earth. Historically, the most prominent stars were grouped into constellations and asterisms, the brightest of which gained proper names. Astronomers have assembled star catalogues that identify the known stars and provide standardized stellar designations. However, most of the stars in the Universe, including all stars outside our galaxy, the Milky Way, are invisible to the naked eye from Earth. Indeed, most are invisible from Earth even through the most powerful telescopes.

For at least a portion of its life, a star shines due to thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium in its core, releasing energy that traverses the star’s interior and then radiates into outer space. Almost all naturally occurring elements heavier than helium are created by stellar nucleosynthesis during the star’s lifetime, and for some stars by supernova nucleosynthesis when it explodes. Near the end of its life, a star can also contain degenerate matter. Astronomers can determine the mass, age, metallicity (chemical composition), and many other properties of a star by observing its motion through space, its luminosity, and spectrum respectively. The total mass of a star is the main factor that determines its evolution and eventual fate. Other characteristics of a star, including diameter and temperature, change over its life, while the star’s environment affects its rotation and movement. A plot of the temperature of many stars against their luminosities produces a plot known as a Hertzsprung–Russell diagram (H–R diagram). Plotting a particular star on that diagram allows the age and evolutionary state of that star to be determined.

A star’s life begins with the gravitational collapse of a gaseous nebula of material composed primarily of hydrogen, along with helium and trace amounts of heavier elements. When the stellar core is sufficiently dense, hydrogen becomes steadily converted into helium through nuclear fusion, releasing energy in the process.[1] The remainder of the star’s interior carries energy away from the core through a combination of radiative and convective heat transfer processes. The star’s internal pressure prevents it from collapsing further under its own gravity. A star with mass greater than 0.4 times the Sun’s will expand to become a red giant when the hydrogen fuel in its core is exhausted.[2] In some cases, it will fuse heavier elements at the core or in shells around the core. As the star expands it throws a part of its mass, enriched with those heavier elements, into the interstellar environment, to be recycled later as new stars.[3] Meanwhile, the core becomes a stellar remnant: a white dwarf, a neutron star, or if it is sufficiently massive a black hole.

Binary and multi-star systems consist of two or more stars that are gravitationally bound and generally move around each other in stable orbits. When two such stars have a relatively close orbit, their gravitational interaction can have a significant impact on their evolution.[4] Stars can form part of a much larger gravitationally bound structure, such as a star cluster or a galaxy.

## Observation history

People have seen patterns in the stars since ancient times.[5] This 1690 depiction of the constellation of Leo, the lion, is by Johannes Hevelius.[6]

The constellation of Leo as it can be seen by the naked eye. Lines have been added.

Historically, stars have been important to civilizations throughout the world. They have been part of religious practices and used for celestial navigation and orientation. Many ancient astronomers believed that stars were permanently affixed to a heavenly sphere and that they were immutable. By convention, astronomers grouped stars into constellations and used them to track the motions of the planets and the inferred position of the Sun.[5] The motion of the Sun against the background stars (and the horizon) was used to create calendars, which could be used to regulate agricultural practices.[7] The Gregorian calendar, currently used nearly everywhere in the world, is a solar calendar based on the angle of the Earth’s rotational axis relative to its local star, the Sun.

The oldest accurately dated star chart was the result of ancient Egyptian astronomy in 1534 BC.[8] The earliest known star catalogues were compiled by the ancient Babylonian astronomers of Mesopotamia in the late 2nd millennium BC, during the Kassite Period (ca. 1531–1155 BC).[9]

The first star catalogue in Greek astronomy was created by Aristillus in approximately 300 BC, with the help of Timocharis.[10] The star catalog of Hipparchus (2nd century BC) included 1020 stars, and was used to assemble Ptolemy‘s star catalogue.[11] Hipparchus is known for the discovery of the first recorded nova (new star).[12] Many of the constellations and star names in use today derive from Greek astronomy.

In spite of the apparent immutability of the heavens, Chinese astronomers were aware that new stars could appear.[13] In 185 AD, they were the first to observe and write about a supernova, now known as the SN 185.[14] The brightest stellar event in recorded history was the SN 1006 supernova, which was observed in 1006 and written about by the Egyptian astronomer Ali ibn Ridwan and several Chinese astronomers.[15] The SN 1054 supernova, which gave birth to the Crab Nebula, was also observed by Chinese and Islamic astronomers.[16][17][18]

Medieval Islamic astronomers gave Arabic names to many stars that are still used today and they invented numerous astronomical instruments that could compute the positions of the stars. They built the first large observatory research institutes, mainly for the purpose of producing Zij star catalogues.[19] Among these, the Book of Fixed Stars (964) was written by the Persian astronomer Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi, who observed a number of stars, star clusters (including the Omicron Velorum and Brocchi’s Clusters) and galaxies (including the Andromeda Galaxy).[20] According to A. Zahoor, in the 11th century, the Persian polymath scholar Abu Rayhan Biruni described the Milky Way galaxy as a multitude of fragments having the properties of nebulous stars, and also gave the latitudes of various stars during a lunar eclipse in 1019.[21]

According to Josep Puig, the Andalusian astronomer Ibn Bajjah proposed that the Milky Way was made up of many stars that almost touched one another and appeared to be a continuous image due to the effect of refraction from sublunary material, citing his observation of the conjunction of Jupiter and Mars on 500 AH (1106/1107 AD) as evidence.[22] Early European astronomers such as Tycho Brahe identified new stars in the night sky (later termed novae), suggesting that the heavens were not immutable. In 1584 Giordano Bruno suggested that the stars were like the Sun, and may have other planets, possibly even Earth-like, in orbit around them,[23] an idea that had been suggested earlier by the ancient Greek philosophers, Democritus and Epicurus,[24] and by medieval Islamic cosmologists[25] such as Fakhr al-Din al-Razi.[26] By the following century, the idea of the stars being the same as the Sun was reaching a consensus among astronomers. To explain why these stars exerted no net gravitational pull on the Solar System, Isaac Newton suggested that the stars were equally distributed in every direction, an idea prompted by the theologian Richard Bentley.[27]

The Italian astronomer Geminiano Montanari recorded observing variations in luminosity of the star Algol in 1667. Edmond Halley published the first measurements of the proper motion of a pair of nearby “fixed” stars, demonstrating that they had changed positions since the time of the ancient Greek astronomers Ptolemy and Hipparchus.[23]

William Herschel was the first astronomer to attempt to determine the distribution of stars in the sky. During the 1780s he established a series of gauges in 600 directions and counted the stars observed along each line of sight. From this he deduced that the number of stars steadily increased toward one side of the sky, in the direction of the Milky Waycore. His son John Herschel repeated this study in the southern hemisphere and found a corresponding increase in the same direction.[28] In addition to his other accomplishments, William Herschel is also noted for his discovery that some stars do not merely lie along the same line of sight, but are also physical companions that form binary star systems.

The science of stellar spectroscopy was pioneered by Joseph von Fraunhofer and Angelo Secchi. By comparing the spectra of stars such as Sirius to the Sun, they found differences in the strength and number of their absorption lines—the dark lines in a stellar spectra caused by the atmosphere’s absorption of specific frequencies. In 1865 Secchi began classifying stars into spectral types.[29] However, the modern version of the stellar classification scheme was developed by Annie J. Cannon during the 1900s.

Alpha Centauri A and B over limb of Saturn

The first direct measurement of the distance to a star (61 Cygni at 11.4 light-years) was made in 1838 by Friedrich Bessel using the parallax technique. Parallax measurements demonstrated the vast separation of the stars in the heavens.[23] Observation of double stars gained increasing importance during the 19th century. In 1834, Friedrich Bessel observed changes in the proper motion of the star Sirius and inferred a hidden companion. Edward Pickering discovered the first spectroscopic binary in 1899 when he observed the periodic splitting of the spectral lines of the star Mizar in a 104-day period. Detailed observations of many binary star systems were collected by astronomers such as Friedrich Georg Wilhelm von Struve and S. W. Burnham, allowing the masses of stars to be determined from computation of orbital elements. The first solution to the problem of deriving an orbit of binary stars from telescope observations was made by Felix Savary in 1827.[30] The twentieth century saw increasingly rapid advances in the scientific study of stars. The photograph became a valuable astronomical tool. Karl Schwarzschild discovered that the color of a star and, hence, its temperature, could be determined by comparing the visual magnitude against the photographic magnitude. The development of the photoelectric photometer allowed precise measurements of magnitude at multiple wavelength intervals. In 1921 Albert A. Michelson made the first measurements of a stellar diameter using an interferometer on the Hooker telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory.[31]

Important theoretical work on the physical structure of stars occurred during the first decades of the twentieth century. In 1913, the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram was developed, propelling the astrophysical study of stars. Successful models were developed to explain the interiors of stars and stellar evolution. Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin first proposed that stars were made primarily of hydrogen and helium in her 1925 PhD thesis.[32] The spectra of stars were further understood through advances in quantum physics. This allowed the chemical composition of the stellar atmosphere to be determined.[33]

With the exception of supernovae, individual stars have primarily been observed in the Local Group,[34] and especially in the visible part of the Milky Way (as demonstrated by the detailed star catalogues available for our galaxy).[35] But some stars have been observed in the M100 galaxy of the Virgo Cluster, about 100 million light years from the Earth.[36]In the Local Supercluster it is possible to see star clusters, and current telescopes could in principle observe faint individual stars in the Local Group[37] (see Cepheids). However, outside the Local Supercluster of galaxies, neither individual stars nor clusters of stars have been observed. The only exception is a faint image of a large star cluster containing hundreds of thousands of stars located at a distance of one billion light years[38]—ten times further than the most distant star cluster previously observed.

## Designations

This view contains blue stars known as “Blue stragglers“, for their apparent location on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram

The concept of a constellation was known to exist during the Babylonian period. Ancient sky watchers imagined that prominent arrangements of stars formed patterns, and they associated these with particular aspects of nature or their myths. Twelve of these formations lay along the band of the ecliptic and these became the basis of astrology.[39] Many of the more prominent individual stars were also given names, particularly with Arabic or Latin designations.

As well as certain constellations and the Sun itself, individual stars have their own myths.[40] To the Ancient Greeks, some “stars”, known as planets (Greek πλανήτης (planētēs), meaning “wanderer”), represented various important deities, from which the names of the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were taken.[40] (Uranus and Neptune were also Greek and Roman gods, but neither planet was known in Antiquity because of their low brightness. Their names were assigned by later astronomers.)

Circa 1600, the names of the constellations were used to name the stars in the corresponding regions of the sky. The German astronomer Johann Bayer created a series of star maps and applied Greek letters as designations to the stars in each constellation. Later a numbering system based on the star’s right ascension was invented and added to John Flamsteed‘s star catalogue in his book “Historia coelestis Britannica” (the 1712 edition), whereby this numbering system came to be called Flamsteed designation or Flamsteed numbering.[41][42]

The only internationally recognized authority for naming celestial bodies is the International Astronomical Union (IAU).[43] The International Astronomical Union maintains the Working Group on Star Names (WGSN)[44] which catalogs and standardizes proper names for stars. A number of private companies sell names of stars, which the British Library calls an unregulated commercial enterprise.[45][46] The IAU has disassociated itself from this commercial practice, and these names are neither recognized by the IAU, professional astronomers, nor the amateur astronomy community.[47] One such star-naming company is the International Star Registry, which, during the 1980s, was accused of deceptive practice for making it appear that the assigned name was official. This now-discontinued ISR practice was informally labeled a scam and a fraud,[48][49][50][51] and the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs issued a violation against ISR for engaging in a deceptive trade practice.[52][53]

## Units of measurement

Although stellar parameters can be expressed in SI units or CGS units, it is often most convenient to express mass, luminosity, and radii in solar units, based on the characteristics of the Sun. In 2015, the IAU defined a set of nominal solar values (defined as SI constants, without uncertainties) which can be used for quoting stellar parameters:

 nominal solar luminosity: L⊙ = 3.828 × 1026 W [54] nominal solar radius R⊙ = 6.957 × 108 m [54]

The solar mass M was not explicitly defined by the IAU due to the large relative uncertainty (10−4) of the Newtonian gravitational constant G. However, since the product of the Newtonian gravitational constant and solar mass together (GM) has been determined to much greater precision, the IAU defined the nominal solar mass parameter to be:

 nominal solar mass parameter: GM⊙ = 1.3271244 × 1020 m3 s−2 [54]

However, one can combine the nominal solar mass parameter with the most recent (2014) CODATA estimate of the Newtonian gravitational constant G to derive the solar mass to be approximately 1.9885 × 1030 kg. Although the exact values for the luminosity, radius, mass parameter, and mass may vary slightly in the future due to observational uncertainties, the 2015 IAU nominal constants will remain the same SI values as they remain useful measures for quoting stellar parameters.

Large lengths, such as the radius of a giant star or the semi-major axis of a binary star system, are often expressed in terms of the astronomical unit — approximately equal to the mean distance between the Earth and the Sun (150 million km or approximately 93 million miles). In 2012, the IAU defined the astronomical constant to be an exact length in meters: 149,597,870,700 m.[54]

## Formation and evolution

Stellar evolution of low-mass (left cycle) and high-mass (right cycle) stars, with examples in italics

Main article: Stellar evolution

Stars condense from regions of space of higher density, yet those regions are less dense than within a vacuum chamber. These regions – known as molecular clouds – consist mostly of hydrogen, with about 23 to 28 percent helium and a few percent heavier elements. One example of such a star-forming region is the Orion Nebula.[55] Most stars form in groups of dozens to hundreds of thousands of stars.[56] Massive stars in these groups may powerfully illuminate those clouds, ionizing the hydrogen, and creating H II regions. Such feedback effects, from star formation, may ultimately disrupt the cloud and prevent further star formation.

All stars spend the majority of their existence as main sequence stars, fueled primarily by the nuclear fusion of hydrogen into helium within their cores. However, stars of different masses have markedly different properties at various stages of their development. The ultimate fate of more massive stars differs from that of less massive stars, as do their luminosities and the impact they have on their environment. Accordingly, astronomers often group stars by their mass:[57]

• Very low mass stars, with masses below 0.5 M, are fully convective and distribute helium evenly throughout the whole star while on the main sequence. Therefore, they never undergo shell burning, never become red giants, which cease fusing and become helium white dwarfs and slowly cool after exhausting their hydrogen.[58] However, as the lifetime of 0.5 M stars is longer than the age of the universe, no such star has yet reached the white dwarf stage.
• Low mass stars (including the Sun), with a mass between 0.5 M and 1.8–2.5 M depending on composition, do become red giants as their core hydrogen is depleted and they begin to burn helium in core in a helium flash; they develop a degenerate carbon-oxygen core later on the asymptotic giant branch; they finally blow off their outer shell as a planetary nebula and leave behind their core in the form of a white dwarf.
• Intermediate-mass stars, between 1.8–2.5 M and 5–10 M, pass through evolutionary stages similar to low mass stars, but after a relatively short period on the RGB they ignite helium without a flash and spend an extended period in the red clump before forming a degenerate carbon-oxygen core.
• Massive stars generally have a minimum mass of 7–10 M (possibly as low as 5–6 M). After exhausting the hydrogen at the core these stars become supergiants and go on to fuse elements heavier than helium. They end their lives when their cores collapse and they explode as supernovae.

### Star formation

Main article: Star formation

The formation of a star begins with gravitational instability within a molecular cloud, caused by regions of higher density – often triggered by compression of clouds by radiation from massive stars, expanding bubbles in the interstellar medium, the collision of different molecular clouds, or the collision of galaxies (as in a starburst galaxy).[59][60] When a region reaches a sufficient density of matter to satisfy the criteria for Jeans instability, it begins to collapse under its own gravitational force.[61]

Artist’s conception of the birth of a star within a dense molecular cloud.

As the cloud collapses, individual conglomerations of dense dust and gas form “Bok globules“. As a globule collapses and the density increases, the gravitational energy converts into heat and the temperature rises. When the protostellar cloud has approximately reached the stable condition of hydrostatic equilibrium, a protostar forms at the core.[62] These pre–main sequence stars are often surrounded by a protoplanetary disk and powered mainly by the conversion of gravitational energy. The period of gravitational contraction lasts about 10 to 15 million years.

A cluster of approximately 500 young stars lies within the nearby W40 stellar nursery.

Early stars of less than 2 M are called T Tauri stars, while those with greater mass are Herbig Ae/Be stars. These newly formed stars emit jets of gas along their axis of rotation, which may reduce the angular momentum of the collapsing star and result in small patches of nebulosity known as Herbig–Haro objects.[63][64] These jets, in combination with radiation from nearby massive stars, may help to drive away the surrounding cloud from which the star was formed.[65]

Early in their development, T Tauri stars follow the Hayashi track—they contract and decrease in luminosity while remaining at roughly the same temperature. Less massive T Tauri stars follow this track to the main sequence, while more massive stars turn onto the Henyey track.

Most stars are observed to be members of binary star systems, and the properties of those binaries are the result of the conditions in which they formed.[66] A gas cloud must lose its angular momentum in order to collapse and form a star. The fragmentation of the cloud into multiple stars distributes some of that angular momentum. The primordial binaries transfer some angular momentum by gravitational interactions during close encounters with other stars in young stellar clusters. These interactions tend to split apart more widely separated (soft) binaries while causing hard binaries to become more tightly bound. This produces the separation of binaries into their two observed populations distributions.

### Main sequence

Main article: Main sequence

Stars spend about 90% of their existence fusing hydrogen into helium in high-temperature and high-pressure reactions near the core. Such stars are said to be on the main sequence, and are called dwarf stars. Starting at zero-age main sequence, the proportion of helium in a star’s core will steadily increase, the rate of nuclear fusion at the core will slowly increase, as will the star’s temperature and luminosity.[67] The Sun, for example, is estimated to have increased in luminosity by about 40% since it reached the main sequence 4.6 billion (4.6 × 109) years ago.[68]

Every star generates a stellar wind of particles that causes a continual outflow of gas into space. For most stars, the mass lost is negligible. The Sun loses 10−14 M every year,[69] or about 0.01% of its total mass over its entire lifespan. However, very massive stars can lose 10−7 to 10−5 M each year, significantly affecting their evolution.[70] Stars that begin with more than 50 M can lose over half their total mass while on the main sequence.[71]

An example of a Hertzsprung–Russell diagram for a set of stars that includes the Sun (center). (See “Classification” below.)

The time a star spends on the main sequence depends primarily on the amount of fuel it has and the rate at which it fuses it. The Sun’s is expected to live 10 billion (1010) years. Massive stars consume their fuel very rapidly and are short-lived. Low mass stars consume their fuel very slowly. Stars less massive than 0.25 M, called red dwarfs, are able to fuse nearly all of their mass while stars of about 1 M can only fuse about 10% of their mass. The combination of their slow fuel-consumption and relatively large usable fuel supply allows low mass stars to last about one trillion (1012) years; the most extreme of 0.08 M) will last for about 12 trillion years. Red dwarfs become hotter and more luminous as they accumulate helium. When they eventually run out of hydrogen, they contract into a white dwarf and decline in temperature.[58] However, since the lifespan of such stars is greater than the current age of the universe (13.8 billion years), no stars under about 0.85 M[72] are expected to have moved off the main sequence.

Besides mass, the elements heavier than helium can play a significant role in the evolution of stars. Astronomers label all elements heavier than helium “metals”, and call the chemical concentration of these elements in a star, its metallicity. A star’s metallicity can influence the time the star takes to burn its fuel, and controls the formation of its magnetic fields,[73] which affects the strength of its stellar wind.[74] Older, population II stars have substantially less metallicity than the younger, population I stars due to the composition of the molecular clouds from which they formed. Over time, such clouds become increasingly enriched in heavier elements as older stars die and shed portions of their atmospheres.

### Post–main sequence

Main article: Red giant

As stars of at least 0.4 M[2] exhaust their supply of hydrogen at their core, they start to fuse hydrogen in a shell outside the helium core. Their outer layers expand and cool greatly as they form a red giant. In about 5 billion years, when the Sun enters the helium burning phase, it will expand to a maximum radius of roughly 1 astronomical unit (150 million kilometres), 250 times its present size, and lose 30% of its current mass.[68][75]

As the hydrogen shell burning produces more helium, the core increases in mass and temperature. In a red giant of up to 2.25 M, the mass of the helium core becomes degenerate prior to helium fusion. Finally, when the temperature increases sufficiently, helium fusion begins explosively in what is called a helium flash, and the star rapidly shrinks in radius, increases its surface temperature, and moves to the horizontal branch of the HR diagram. For more massive stars, helium core fusion starts before the core becomes degenerate, and the star spends some time in the red clump, slowly burning helium, before the outer convective envelope collapses and the star then moves to the horizontal branch.[4]

After the star has fused the helium of its core, the carbon product fuses producing a hot core with an outer shell of fusing helium. The star then follows an evolutionary path called the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) that parallels the other described red giant phase, but with a higher luminosity. The more massive AGB stars may undergo a brief period of carbon fusion before the core becomes degenerate.

#### Massive stars

During their helium-burning phase, a star of more than nine solar masses expands to form first a blue and then a red supergiant. Particularly massive stars may evolve to a Wolf-Rayet star, characterised by spectra dominated by emission lines of elements heavier than hydrogen, which have reached the surface due to strong convection and intense mass loss.

When helium is exhausted at the core of a massive star, the core contracts and the temperature and pressure rises enough to fuse carbon (see Carbon burning process). This process continues, with the successive stages being fueled by neon (see neon burning process), oxygen (see oxygen burning process), and silicon (see silicon burning process). Near the end of the star’s life, fusion continues along a series of onion-layer shells within a massive star. Each shell fuses a different element, with the outermost shell fusing hydrogen; the next shell fusing helium, and so forth.[76]

The final stage occurs when a massive star begins producing iron. Since iron nuclei are more tightly bound than any heavier nuclei, any fusion beyond iron does not produce a net release of energy. To a very limited degree such a process proceeds, but it consumes energy. Likewise, since they are more tightly bound than all lighter nuclei, such energy cannot be released by fission.[77]

#### Collapse

As a star’s core shrinks, the intensity of radiation from that surface increases, creating such radiation pressure on the outer shell of gas that it will push those layers away, forming a planetary nebula. If what remains after the outer atmosphere has been shed is less than 1.4 M, it shrinks to a relatively tiny object about the size of Earth, known as a white dwarf. White dwarfs lack the mass for further gravitational compression to take place.[78] The electron-degenerate matter inside a white dwarf is no longer a plasma, even though stars are generally referred to as being spheres of plasma. Eventually, white dwarfs fade into black dwarfs over a very long period of time.

The Crab Nebula, remnants of a supernova that was first observed around 1050 AD

In larger stars, fusion continues until the iron core has grown so large (more than 1.4 M) that it can no longer support its own mass. This core will suddenly collapse as its electrons are driven into its protons, forming neutrons, neutrinos, and gamma rays in a burst of electron capture and inverse beta decay. The shockwave formed by this sudden collapse causes the rest of the star to explode in a supernova. Supernovae become so bright that they may briefly outshine the star’s entire home galaxy. When they occur within the Milky Way, supernovae have historically been observed by naked-eye observers as “new stars” where none seemingly existed before.[79]

A supernova explosion blows away the star’s outer layers, leaving a remnant such as the Crab Nebula.[79] The core is compressed into a neutron star, which sometimes manifests itself as a pulsar or X-ray burster. In the case of the largest stars, the remnant is a black hole greater than 4 M.[80] In a neutron star the matter is in a state known as neutron-degenerate matter, with a more exotic form of degenerate matter, QCD matter, possibly present in the core. Within a black hole, the matter is in a state that is not currently understood.

The blown-off outer layers of dying stars include heavy elements, which may be recycled during the formation of new stars. These heavy elements allow the formation of rocky planets. The outflow from supernovae and the stellar wind of large stars play an important part in shaping the interstellar medium.[79]

#### Binary stars

The post–main-sequence evolution of binary stars may be significantly different from the evolution of single stars of the same mass. If stars in a binary system are sufficiently close, when one of the stars expands to become a red giant it may overflow its Roche lobe, the region around a star where material is gravitationally bound to that star, leading to transfer of material to the other. When the Roche lobe is violated, a variety of phenomena can result, including contact binaries, common-envelope binaries, cataclysmic variables, and type Ia supernovae.

## Distribution

A white dwarf star in orbit around Sirius (artist’s impression).

Stars are not spread uniformly across the universe, but are normally grouped into galaxies along with interstellar gas and dust. A typical galaxy contains hundreds of billions of stars, and there are more than 100 billion (1011) galaxies in the observable universe.[81] In 2010, one estimate of the number of stars in the observable universe was 300 sextillion (3 × 1023).[82] While it is often believed that stars only exist within galaxies, intergalactic stars have been discovered.[83]

A multi-star system consists of two or more gravitationally bound stars that orbit each other. The simplest and most common multi-star system is a binary star, but systems of three or more stars are also found. For reasons of orbital stability, such multi-star systems are often organized into hierarchical sets of binary stars.[84] Larger groups called star clusters also exist. These range from loose stellar associations with only a few stars, up to enormous globular clusters with hundreds of thousands of stars. Such systems orbit their host galaxy.

It has been a long-held assumption that the majority of stars occur in gravitationally bound, multiple-star systems. This is particularly true for very massive O and B class stars, where 80% of the stars are believed to be part of multiple-star systems. The proportion of single star systems increases with decreasing star mass, so that only 25% of red dwarfs are known to have stellar companions. As 85% of all stars are red dwarfs, most stars in the Milky Way are likely single from birth.[85]

The nearest star to the Earth, apart from the Sun, is Proxima Centauri, which is 39.9 trillion kilometres, or 4.2 light-years. Travelling at the orbital speed of the Space Shuttle (8 kilometres per second—almost 30,000 kilometres per hour), it would take about 150,000 years to arrive.[86] This is typical of stellar separations in galactic discs.[87] Stars can be much closer to each other in the centres of galaxies and in globular clusters, or much farther apart in galactic halos.

Due to the relatively vast distances between stars outside the galactic nucleus, collisions between stars are thought to be rare. In denser regions such as the core of globular clusters or the galactic center, collisions can be more common.[88] Such collisions can produce what are known as blue stragglers. These abnormal stars have a higher surface temperature than the other main sequence stars with the same luminosity of the cluster to which it belongs.[89]

## Characteristics

Some of the well-known stars with their apparent colors and relative sizes.

Almost everything about a star is determined by its initial mass, including such characteristics as luminosity, size, evolution, lifespan, and its eventual fate.

### Age

Most stars are between 1 billion and 10 billion years old. Some stars may even be close to 13.8 billion years old—the observed age of the universe. The oldest star yet discovered, HD 140283, nicknamed Methuselah star, is an estimated 14.46 ± 0.8 billion years old.[90] (Due to the uncertainty in the value, this age for the star does not conflict with the age of the Universe, determined by the Planck satellite as 13.799 ± 0.021).[90][91]

The more massive the star, the shorter its lifespan, primarily because massive stars have greater pressure on their cores, causing them to burn hydrogen more rapidly. The most massive stars last an average of a few million years, while stars of minimum mass (red dwarfs) burn their fuel very slowly and can last tens to hundreds of billions of years.[92][93]

### Chemical composition

When stars form in the present Milky Way galaxy they are composed of about 71% hydrogen and 27% helium,[94] as measured by mass, with a small fraction of heavier elements. Typically the portion of heavy elements is measured in terms of the iron content of the stellar atmosphere, as iron is a common element and its absorption lines are relatively easy to measure. The portion of heavier elements may be an indicator of the likelihood that the star has a planetary system.[95]

The star with the lowest iron content ever measured is the dwarf HE1327-2326, with only 1/200,000th the iron content of the Sun.[96] By contrast, the super-metal-rich star μ Leonis has nearly double the abundance of iron as the Sun, while the planet-bearing star 14 Herculis has nearly triple the iron.[97] There also exist chemically peculiar stars that show unusual abundances of certain elements in their spectrum; especially chromium and rare earth elements.[98] Stars with cooler outer atmospheres, including the Sun, can form various diatomic and polyatomic molecules.[99]

### Diameter

Stars vary widely in size. In each image in the sequence, the right-most object appears as the left-most object in the next panel. The Earth appears at right in panel 1 and the Sun is second from the right in panel 3. The rightmost star at panel 6 is UY Scuti, the largest known star.

Due to their great distance from the Earth, all stars except the Sun appear to the unaided eye as shining points in the night sky that twinkle because of the effect of the Earth’s atmosphere. The Sun is also a star, but it is close enough to the Earth to appear as a disk instead, and to provide daylight. Other than the Sun, the star with the largest apparent size is R Doradus, with an angular diameter of only 0.057 arcseconds.[100]

The disks of most stars are much too small in angular size to be observed with current ground-based optical telescopes, and so interferometer telescopes are required to produce images of these objects. Another technique for measuring the angular size of stars is through occultation. By precisely measuring the drop in brightness of a star as it is occulted by the Moon (or the rise in brightness when it reappears), the star’s angular diameter can be computed.[101]

Stars range in size from neutron stars, which vary anywhere from 20 to 40 km (25 mi) in diameter, to supergiants like Betelgeuse in the Orion constellation, which has a diameter approximately 1,070 times that of the Sun—about 1,490,171,880 km (925,949,878 mi). Betelgeuse, however, has a much lower density than the Sun.[102]

### Kinematics

Main article: Stellar kinematics

The Pleiades, an open cluster of stars in the constellation of Taurus. These stars share a common motion through space.[103]

The motion of a star relative to the Sun can provide useful information about the origin and age of a star, as well as the structure and evolution of the surrounding galaxy. The components of motion of a star consist of the radial velocity toward or away from the Sun, and the traverse angular movement, which is called its proper motion.

Radial velocity is measured by the doppler shift of the star’s spectral lines, and is given in units of km/s. The proper motion of a star, its parallax, is determined by precise astrometric measurements in units of milli-arc seconds (mas) per year. With knowledge of the star’s parallax and its distance, the proper motion velocity can be calculated. Together with the radial velocity, the total velocity can be calculated. Stars with high rates of proper motion are likely to be relatively close to the Sun, making them good candidates for parallax measurements.[104]

When both rates of movement are known, the space velocity of the star relative to the Sun or the galaxy can be computed. Among nearby stars, it has been found that younger population I stars have generally lower velocities than older, population II stars. The latter have elliptical orbits that are inclined to the plane of the galaxy.[105] A comparison of the kinematics of nearby stars has allowed astronomers to trace their origin to common points in giant molecular clouds, and are referred to as stellar associations.[106]

### Magnetic field

Surface magnetic field of SU Aur (a young star of T Tauri type), reconstructed by means of Zeeman-Doppler imaging

The magnetic field of a star is generated within regions of the interior where convective circulation occurs. This movement of conductive plasma functions like a dynamo, wherein the movement of electrical charges induce magnetic fields, as does a mechanical dynamo. Those magnetic fields have a great range that extend throughout and beyond the star. The strength of the magnetic field varies with the mass and composition of the star, and the amount of magnetic surface activity depends upon the star’s rate of rotation. This surface activity produces starspots, which are regions of strong magnetic fields and lower than normal surface temperatures. Coronal loops are arching magnetic field flux lines that rise from a star’s surface into the star’s outer atmosphere, its corona. The coronal loops can be seen due to the plasma they conduct along their length. Stellar flares are bursts of high-energy particles that are emitted due to the same magnetic activity.[107]

Young, rapidly rotating stars tend to have high levels of surface activity because of their magnetic field. The magnetic field can act upon a star’s stellar wind, functioning as a brake to gradually slow the rate of rotation with time. Thus, older stars such as the Sun have a much slower rate of rotation and a lower level of surface activity. The activity levels of slowly rotating stars tend to vary in a cyclical manner and can shut down altogether for periods of time.[108] During the Maunder minimum, for example, the Sun underwent a 70-year period with almost no sunspot activity.

### Mass

Main article: Stellar mass

One of the most massive stars known is Eta Carinae,[109] which, with 100–150 times as much mass as the Sun, will have a lifespan of only several million years. Studies of the most massive open clusters suggests 150 M as an upper limit for stars in the current era of the universe.[110] This represents an empirical value for the theoretical limit on the mass of forming stars due to increasing radiation pressure on the accreting gas cloud. Several stars in the R136 cluster in the Large Magellanic Cloud have been measured with larger masses,[111] but it has been determined that they could have been created through the collision and merger of massive stars in close binary systems, sidestepping the 150 M limit on massive star formation.[112]

The reflection nebula NGC 1999 is brilliantly illuminated by V380 Orionis (center), a variable star with about 3.5 times the mass of the Sun. The black patch of sky is a vast hole of empty space and not a dark nebula as previously thought.

The first stars to form after the Big Bang may have been larger, up to 300 M,[113] due to the complete absence of elements heavier than lithium in their composition. This generation of supermassive population III stars is likely to have existed in the very early universe (i.e., they are observed to have a high redshift), and may have started the production of chemical elements heavier than hydrogen that are needed for the later formation of planets and life. In June 2015, astronomers reported evidence for Population III stars in the Cosmos Redshift 7 galaxy at z = 6.60.[114][115]

With a mass only 80 times that of Jupiter (MJ), 2MASS J0523-1403 is the smallest known star undergoing nuclear fusion in its core.[116]For stars with metallicity similar to the Sun, the theoretical minimum mass the star can have and still undergo fusion at the core, is estimated to be about 75 MJ.[117][118] When the metallicity is very low, however, the minimum star size seems to be about 8.3% of the solar mass, or about 87 MJ.[118][119] Smaller bodies called brown dwarfs, occupy a poorly defined grey area between stars and gas giants.

The combination of the radius and the mass of a star determines its surface gravity. Giant stars have a much lower surface gravity than do main sequence stars, while the opposite is the case for degenerate, compact stars such as white dwarfs. The surface gravity can influence the appearance of a star’s spectrum, with higher gravity causing a broadening of the absorption lines.[33]

### Rotation

Main article: Stellar rotation

The rotation rate of stars can be determined through spectroscopic measurement, or more exactly determined by tracking their starspots. Young stars can have a rotation greater than 100 km/s at the equator. The B-class star Achernar, for example, has an equatorial velocity of about 225 km/s or greater, causing its equator to be slung outward and giving it an equatorial diameter that is more than 50% greater than between the poles. This rate of rotation is just below the critical velocity of 300 km/s at which speed the star would break apart.[120] By contrast, the Sun rotates once every 25 – 35 days, with an equatorial velocity of 1.994 km/s. A main sequence star‘s magnetic field and the stellar wind serve to slow its rotation by a significant amount as it evolves on the main sequence.[121]

Degenerate stars have contracted into a compact mass, resulting in a rapid rate of rotation. However they have relatively low rates of rotation compared to what would be expected by conservation of angular momentum—the tendency of a rotating body to compensate for a contraction in size by increasing its rate of spin. A large portion of the star’s angular momentum is dissipated as a result of mass loss through the stellar wind.[122] In spite of this, the rate of rotation for a pulsar can be very rapid. The pulsar at the heart of the Crab nebula, for example, rotates 30 times per second.[123] The rotation rate of the pulsar will gradually slow due to the emission of radiation.

### Temperature

The surface temperature of a main sequence star is determined by the rate of energy production of its core and by its radius, and is often estimated from the star’s color index.[124] The temperature is normally given in terms of an effective temperature, which is the temperature of an idealized black body that radiates its energy at the same luminosity per surface area as the star. Note that the effective temperature is only a representative of the surface, as the temperature increases toward the core.[125] The temperature in the core region of a star is several million kelvins.[126]

The stellar temperature will determine the rate of ionization of various elements, resulting in characteristic absorption lines in the spectrum. The surface temperature of a star, along with its visual absolute magnitude and absorption features, is used to classify a star (see classification below).[33]

Massive main sequence stars can have surface temperatures of 50,000 K. Smaller stars such as the Sun have surface temperatures of a few thousand K. Red giants have relatively low surface temperatures of about 3,600 K; but they also have a high luminosity due to their large exterior surface area.[127]

The energy produced by stars, a product of nuclear fusion, radiates to space as both electromagnetic radiation and particle radiation. The particle radiation emitted by a star is manifested as the stellar wind,[128] which streams from the outer layers as electrically charged protons and alpha and beta particles. Although almost massless, there also exists a steady stream of neutrinos emanating from the star’s core.

The production of energy at the core is the reason stars shine so brightly: every time two or more atomic nuclei fuse together to form a single atomic nucleus of a new heavier element, gamma ray photons are released from the nuclear fusion product. This energy is converted to other forms of electromagnetic energy of lower frequency, such as visible light, by the time it reaches the star’s outer layers.

The color of a star, as determined by the most intense frequency of the visible light, depends on the temperature of the star’s outer layers, including its photosphere.[129] Besides visible light, stars also emit forms of electromagnetic radiation that are invisible to the human eye. In fact, stellar electromagnetic radiation spans the entire electromagnetic spectrum, from the longest wavelengths of radio waves through infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, to the shortest of X-rays, and gamma rays. From the standpoint of total energy emitted by a star, not all components of stellar electromagnetic radiation are significant, but all frequencies provide insight into the star’s physics.

Using the stellar spectrum, astronomers can also determine the surface temperature, surface gravity, metallicity and rotational velocity of a star. If the distance of the star is found, such as by measuring the parallax, then the luminosity of the star can be derived. The mass, radius, surface gravity, and rotation period can then be estimated based on stellar models. (Mass can be calculated for stars in binary systems by measuring their orbital velocities and distances. Gravitational microlensing has been used to measure the mass of a single star.[130]) With these parameters, astronomers can also estimate the age of the star.[131]

### Luminosity

The luminosity of a star is the amount of light and other forms of radiant energy it radiates per unit of time. It has units of power. The luminosity of a star is determined by its radius and surface temperature. Many stars do not radiate uniformly across their entire surface. The rapidly rotating star Vega, for example, has a higher energy flux (power per unit area) at its poles than along its equator.[132]

Patches of the star’s surface with a lower temperature and luminosity than average are known as starspots. Small, dwarf stars such as our Sun generally have essentially featureless disks with only small starspots. Giant stars have much larger, more obvious starspots,[133] and they also exhibit strong stellar limb darkening. That is, the brightness decreases towards the edge of the stellar disk.[134] Red dwarf flare stars such as UV Ceti may also possess prominent starspot features.[135]

### Magnitude

The apparent brightness of a star is expressed in terms of its apparent magnitude. It is a function of the star’s luminosity, its distance from Earth, and the altering of the star’s light as it passes through Earth’s atmosphere. Intrinsic or absolute magnitude is directly related to a star’s luminosity, and is what the apparent magnitude a star would be if the distance between the Earth and the star were 10 parsecs (32.6 light-years).

Number of stars brighter than magnitude
Apparent
magnitude
Number
of stars[136]
0 4
1 15
2 48
3 171
4 513
5 1,602
6 4,800
7 14,000

Both the apparent and absolute magnitude scales are logarithmic units: one whole number difference in magnitude is equal to a brightness variation of about 2.5 times[137] (the 5th root of 100 or approximately 2.512). This means that a first magnitude star (+1.00) is about 2.5 times brighter than a second magnitude (+2.00) star, and about 100 times brighter than a sixth magnitude star (+6.00). The faintest stars visible to the naked eye under good seeing conditions are about magnitude +6.

On both apparent and absolute magnitude scales, the smaller the magnitude number, the brighter the star; the larger the magnitude number, the fainter the star. The brightest stars, on either scale, have negative magnitude numbers. The variation in brightness (ΔL) between two stars is calculated by subtracting the magnitude number of the brighter star (mb) from the magnitude number of the fainter star (mf), then using the difference as an exponent for the base number 2.512; that is to say:

{\displaystyle \Delta {m}=m_{\mathrm {f} }-m_{\mathrm {b} }}
{\displaystyle 2.512^{\Delta {m}}=\Delta {L}}

Relative to both luminosity and distance from Earth, a star’s absolute magnitude (M) and apparent magnitude (m) are not equivalent;[137] for example, the bright star Sirius has an apparent magnitude of −1.44, but it has an absolute magnitude of +1.41.

The Sun has an apparent magnitude of −26.7, but its absolute magnitude is only +4.83. Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky as seen from Earth, is approximately 23 times more luminous than the Sun, while Canopus, the second brightest star in the night sky with an absolute magnitude of −5.53, is approximately 14,000 times more luminous than the Sun. Despite Canopus being vastly more luminous than Sirius, however, Sirius appears brighter than Canopus. This is because Sirius is merely 8.6 light-years from the Earth, while Canopus is much farther away at a distance of 310 light-years.

As of 2006, the star with the highest known absolute magnitude is LBV 1806-20, with a magnitude of −14.2. This star is at least 5,000,000 times more luminous than the Sun.[138]The least luminous stars that are currently known are located in the NGC 6397 cluster. The faintest red dwarfs in the cluster were magnitude 26, while a 28th magnitude white dwarf was also discovered. These faint stars are so dim that their light is as bright as a birthday candle on the Moon when viewed from the Earth.[139]

## Classification

Surface temperature ranges for
different stellar classes[140]
Class Temperature Sample star
O 33,000 K or more Zeta Ophiuchi
B 10,500–30,000 K Rigel
A 7,500–10,000 K Altair
F 6,000–7,200 K Procyon A
G 5,500–6,000 K Sun
K 4,000–5,250 K Epsilon Indi
M 2,600–3,850 K Proxima Centauri

The current stellar classification system originated in the early 20th century, when stars were classified from A to Q based on the strength of the hydrogen line.[141] It thought that the hydrogen line strength was a simple linear function of temperature. Rather, it was more complicated; it strengthened with increasing temperature, it peaked near 9000 K, and then declined at greater temperatures. When the classifications were reordered by temperature, it more closely resembled the modern scheme.[142]

Stars are given a single-letter classification according to their spectra, ranging from type O, which are very hot, to M, which are so cool that molecules may form in their atmospheres. The main classifications in order of decreasing surface temperature are: O, B, A, F, G, K, and M. A variety of rare spectral types are given special classifications. The most common of these are types L and T, which classify the coldest low-mass stars and brown dwarfs. Each letter has 10 sub-divisions, numbered from 0 to 9, in order of decreasing temperature. However, this system breaks down at extreme high temperatures as classes O0 and O1 may not exist.[143]

In addition, stars may be classified by the luminosity effects found in their spectral lines, which correspond to their spatial size and is determined by their surface gravity. These range from 0 (hypergiants) through III (giants) to V (main sequence dwarfs); some authors add VII (white dwarfs). Most stars belong to the main sequence, which consists of ordinary hydrogen-burning stars. These fall along a narrow, diagonal band when graphed according to their absolute magnitude and spectral type.[143] The Sun is a main sequence G2V yellow dwarf of intermediate temperature and ordinary size.

Additional nomenclature, in the form of lower-case letters added to the end of the spectral type to indicate peculiar features of the spectrum. For example, an “e” can indicate the presence of emission lines; “m” represents unusually strong levels of metals, and “var” can mean variations in the spectral type.[143]

White dwarf stars have their own class that begins with the letter D. This is further sub-divided into the classes DA, DB, DC, DO, DZ, and DQ, depending on the types of prominent lines found in the spectrum. This is followed by a numerical value that indicates the temperature.[144]

## Variable stars

Main article: Variable star

The asymmetrical appearance of Mira, an oscillating variable star.

Variable stars have periodic or random changes in luminosity because of intrinsic or extrinsic properties. Of the intrinsically variable stars, the primary types can be subdivided into three principal groups.

During their stellar evolution, some stars pass through phases where they can become pulsating variables. Pulsating variable stars vary in radius and luminosity over time, expanding and contracting with periods ranging from minutes to years, depending on the size of the star. This category includes Cepheid and Cepheid-like stars, and long-period variables such as Mira.[145]

Eruptive variables are stars that experience sudden increases in luminosity because of flares or mass ejection events.[145] This group includes protostars, Wolf-Rayet stars, and flare stars, as well as giant and supergiant stars.

Cataclysmic or explosive variable stars are those that undergo a dramatic change in their properties. This group includes novae and supernovae. A binary star system that includes a nearby white dwarf can produce certain types of these spectacular stellar explosions, including the nova and a Type 1a supernova.[4] The explosion is created when the white dwarf accretes hydrogen from the companion star, building up mass until the hydrogen undergoes fusion.[146] Some novae are also recurrent, having periodic outbursts of moderate amplitude.[145]

Stars can also vary in luminosity because of extrinsic factors, such as eclipsing binaries, as well as rotating stars that produce extreme starspots.[145] A notable example of an eclipsing binary is Algol, which regularly varies in magnitude from 2.3 to 3.5 over a period of 2.87 days.

## Structure

Main article: Stellar structure

Internal structures of main sequence stars, convection zones with arrowed cycles and radiative zones with red flashes. To the left a low-mass red dwarf, in the center a mid-sized yellow dwarf, and, at the right, a massive blue-white main sequence star.

The interior of a stable star is in a state of hydrostatic equilibrium: the forces on any small volume almost exactly counterbalance each other. The balanced forces are inward gravitational force and an outward force due to the pressure gradient within the star. The pressure gradient is established by the temperature gradient of the plasma; the outer part of the star is cooler than the core. The temperature at the core of a main sequence or giant star is at least on the order of 107 K. The resulting temperature and pressure at the hydrogen-burning core of a main sequence star are sufficient for nuclear fusion to occur and for sufficient energy to be produced to prevent further collapse of the star.[147][148]

As atomic nuclei are fused in the core, they emit energy in the form of gamma rays. These photons interact with the surrounding plasma, adding to the thermal energy at the core. Stars on the main sequence convert hydrogen into helium, creating a slowly but steadily increasing proportion of helium in the core. Eventually the helium content becomes predominant, and energy production ceases at the core. Instead, for stars of more than 0.4 M, fusion occurs in a slowly expanding shell around the degenerate helium core.[149]

In addition to hydrostatic equilibrium, the interior of a stable star will also maintain an energy balance of thermal equilibrium. There is a radial temperature gradient throughout the interior that results in a flux of energy flowing toward the exterior. The outgoing flux of energy leaving any layer within the star will exactly match the incoming flux from below.

The radiation zone is the region of the stellar interior where the flux of energy outward is dependent on radiative heat transfer, since convective heat transfer is inefficient in that zone. In this region the plasma will not be perturbed, and any mass motions will die out. If this is not the case, however, then the plasma becomes unstable and convection will occur, forming a convection zone. This can occur, for example, in regions where very high energy fluxes occur, such as near the core or in areas with high opacity (making radiatative heat transfer inefficient) as in the outer envelope.[148]

The occurrence of convection in the outer envelope of a main sequence star depends on the star’s mass. Stars with several times the mass of the Sun have a convection zone deep within the interior and a radiative zone in the outer layers. Smaller stars such as the Sun are just the opposite, with the convective zone located in the outer layers.[150] Red dwarf stars with less than 0.4 M are convective throughout, which prevents the accumulation of a helium core.[2] For most stars the convective zones will also vary over time as the star ages and the constitution of the interior is modified.[148]

This diagram shows a cross-section of the Sun.

The photosphere is that portion of a star that is visible to an observer. This is the layer at which the plasma of the star becomes transparent to photons of light. From here, the energy generated at the core becomes free to propagate into space. It is within the photosphere that sun spots, regions of lower than average temperature, appear.

Above the level of the photosphere is the stellar atmosphere. In a main sequence star such as the Sun, the lowest level of the atmosphere, just above the photosphere, is the thin chromosphere region, where spicules appear and stellar flares begin. Above this is the transition region, where the temperature rapidly increases within a distance of only 100 km (62 mi). Beyond this is the corona, a volume of super-heated plasma that can extend outward to several million kilometres.[151] The existence of a corona appears to be dependent on a convective zone in the outer layers of the star.[150] Despite its high temperature, and the corona emits very little light, due to its low gas density. The corona region of the Sun is normally only visible during a solar eclipse.

From the corona, a stellar wind of plasma particles expands outward from the star, until it interacts with the interstellar medium. For the Sun, the influence of its solar wind extends throughout a bubble-shaped region called the heliosphere.[152]

## Nuclear fusion reaction pathways

Overview of the proton-proton chain
The carbon-nitrogen-oxygen cycle

A variety of nuclear fusion reactions take place in the cores of stars, that depend upon their mass and composition. When nuclei fuse, the mass of the fused product is less than the mass of the original parts. This lost mass is converted to electromagnetic energy, according to the mass-energy equivalence relationship E = mc2.[1]

The hydrogen fusion process is temperature-sensitive, so a moderate increase in the core temperature will result in a significant increase in the fusion rate. As a result, the core temperature of main sequence stars only varies from 4 million kelvin for a small M-class star to 40 million kelvin for a massive O-class star.[126]

In the Sun, with a 10-million-kelvin core, hydrogen fuses to form helium in the proton-proton chain reaction:[153]

41H → 22H + 2e+ + 2νe(2 x 0.4 MeV)
2e+ + 2e → 2γ (2 x 1.0 MeV)
21H + 22H → 23He + 2γ (2 x 5.5 MeV)
23He → 4He + 21H (12.9 MeV)

These reactions result in the overall reaction:

41H → 4He + 2e+ + 2γ + 2νe (26.7 MeV)

where e+ is a positron, γ is a gamma ray photon, νe is a neutrino, and H and He are isotopes of hydrogen and helium, respectively. The energy released by this reaction is in millions of electron volts, which is actually only a tiny amount of energy. However enormous numbers of these reactions occur constantly, producing all the energy necessary to sustain the star’s radiation output. In comparison, the combustion of two hydrogen gas molecules with one oxygen gas molecule releases only 5.7 eV.

Minimum stellar mass required for fusion
Element Solar
masses
Hydrogen 0.01
Helium 0.4
Carbon 5[154]
Neon 8

In more massive stars, helium is produced in a cycle of reactions catalyzed by carbon called the carbon-nitrogen-oxygen cycle.[153]

In evolved stars with cores at 100 million kelvin and masses between 0.5 and 10 M, helium can be transformed into carbon in the triple-alpha process that uses the intermediate element beryllium:[153]

4He + 4He + 92 keV → 8*Be
4He + 8*Be + 67 keV → 12*C
12*C → 12C + γ + 7.4 MeV

For an overall reaction of:

34He → 12C + γ + 7.2 MeV

In massive stars, heavier elements can also be burned in a contracting core through the neon burning process and oxygen burning process. The final stage in the stellar nucleosynthesis process is the silicon burning process that results in the production of the stable isotope iron-56, an endothermic process that consumes energy, and so further energy can only be produced through gravitational collapse.[153]

The example below shows the amount of time required for a star of 20 M to consume all of its nuclear fuel. As an O-class main sequence star, it would be 8 times the solar radius and 62,000 times the Sun’s luminosity.[155]

Fuel
material
Temperature
(million kelvins)
Density
(kg/cm3)
Burn duration
(τ in years)
H 37 0.0045 8.1 million
He 188 0.97 1.2 million
C 870 170 976
Ne 1,570 3,100 0.6
O 1,980 5,550 1.25
S/Si 3,340 33,400 0.0315[156]

## References

1. Bahcall, John N. (June 29, 2000). “How the Sun Shines”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 2006-08-30.
2. Richmond, Michael. “Late stages of evolution for low-mass stars”. Rochester Institute of Technology. Retrieved 2006-08-04.
3. Jump up^ “Stellar Evolution & Death”. NASA Observatorium. Archived from the original on 2008-02-10. Retrieved 2006-06-08.
4. Iben, Icko, Jr. (1991). “Single and binary star evolution”. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 76: 55–114. Bibcode:1991ApJS…76…55I. doi:10.1086/191565.
5. Forbes, George (1909). History of Astronomy. London: Watts & Co. ISBN 1-153-62774-4.
6. Jump up^ Hevelius, Johannis (1690). Firmamentum Sobiescianum, sive Uranographia. Gdansk.
7. Jump up^ Tøndering, Claus. “Other ancient calendars”. WebExhibits. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
8. Jump up^ von Spaeth, Ove (2000). “Dating the Oldest Egyptian Star Map”. Centaurus International Magazine of the History of Mathematics, Science and Technology. 42 (3): 159–179. Bibcode:2000Cent…42..159V. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0498.2000.420301.x. Retrieved 2007-10-21.
9. Jump up^ North, John (1995). The Norton History of Astronomy and Cosmology. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company. pp. 30–31. ISBN 0-393-03656-1.
10. Jump up^ Murdin, P. (November 2000). “Aristillus (c. 200 BC)”. Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics. Bibcode:2000eaa..bookE3440.. doi:10.1888/0333750888/3440. ISBN 0-333-75088-8.
11. Jump up^ Grasshoff, Gerd (1990). The history of Ptolemy’s star catalogue. Springer. pp. 1–5. ISBN 0-387-97181-5.
12. Jump up^ Pinotsis, Antonios D. “Astronomy in Ancient Rhodes”. Section of Astrophysics, Astronomy and Mechanics, Department of Physics, University of Athens. Retrieved 2009-06-02.
13. Jump up^ Clark, D. H.; Stephenson, F. R. (June 29, 1981). “The Historical Supernovae”. Supernovae: A survey of current research; Proceedings of the Advanced Study Institute. Cambridge, England: Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Co. pp. 355–370. Bibcode:1982sscr.conf..355C.
14. Jump up^ Zhao, Fu-Yuan; Strom, R. G.; Jiang, Shi-Yang (2006). “The Guest Star of AD185 Must Have Been a Supernova”. Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 6 (5): 635–640. Bibcode:2006ChJAA…6..635Z. doi:10.1088/1009-9271/6/5/17.
15. Jump up^ “Astronomers Peg Brightness of History’s Brightest Star”. NAOA News. March 5, 2003. Retrieved 2006-06-08.
16. Jump up^ Frommert, Hartmut; Kronberg, Christine (August 30, 2006). “Supernova 1054 – Creation of the Crab Nebula”. SEDS. University of Arizona.
17. Jump up^ Duyvendak, J. J. L. (April 1942). “Further Data Bearing on the Identification of the Crab Nebula with the Supernova of 1054 A.D. Part I. The Ancient Oriental Chronicles”. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 54 (318): 91–94. Bibcode:1942PASP…54…91D. doi:10.1086/125409.
Mayall, N. U.; Oort, Jan Hendrik (April 1942). “Further Data Bearing on the Identification of the Crab Nebula with the Supernova of 1054 A.D. Part II. The Astronomical Aspects”. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 54 (318): 95–104. Bibcode:1942PASP…54…95M. doi:10.1086/125410.
18. Jump up^ Brecher, K.; et al. (1983). “Ancient records and the Crab Nebula supernova”. The Observatory. 103: 106–113. Bibcode:1983Obs…103..106B.
19. Jump up^ Kennedy, Edward S. (1962). “Review: The Observatory in Islam and Its Place in the General History of the Observatory by Aydin Sayili”. Isis. 53 (2): 237–239. doi:10.1086/349558.
20. Jump up^ Jones, Kenneth Glyn (1991). Messier’s nebulae and star clusters. Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 0-521-37079-5.
21. Jump up^ Zahoor, A. (1997). “Al-Biruni”. Hasanuddin University. Archived from the original on 2008-06-26. Retrieved 2007-10-21.
22. Jump up^ Montada, Josep Puig (September 28, 2007). “Ibn Bajja”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2008-07-11.
23. Drake, Stephen A. (August 17, 2006). “A Brief History of High-Energy (X-ray & Gamma-Ray) Astronomy”. NASA HEASARC. Retrieved 2006-08-24.
24. Jump up^ Greskovic, Peter; Rudy, Peter (July 24, 2006). “Exoplanets”. ESO. Retrieved 2012-06-15.
25. Jump up^ Ahmad, I. A. (1995). “The impact of the Qur’anic conception of astronomical phenomena on Islamic civilization”. Vistas in Astronomy. 39 (4): 395–403 [402]. Bibcode:1995VA…..39..395A. doi:10.1016/0083-6656(95)00033-X.
26. Jump up^ Setia, Adi (2004). “Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi on Physics and the Nature of the Physical World: A Preliminary Survey”. Islam & Science. 2 (2) – via Questia.
27. Jump up^ Hoskin, Michael (1998). “The Value of Archives in Writing the History of Astronomy”. Space Telescope Science Institute. Retrieved 2006-08-24.
28. Jump up^ Proctor, Richard A. (1870). “Are any of the nebulæ star-systems?”. Nature. 1 (13): 331–333. Bibcode:1870Natur…1..331P. doi:10.1038/001331a0.
29. Jump up^ MacDonnell, Joseph. “Angelo Secchi, S.J. (1818–1878) the Father of Astrophysics”. Fairfield University. Archived from the original on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 2006-10-02.
30. Jump up^ Aitken, Robert G. (1964). The Binary Stars. New York: Dover Publications Inc. p. 66. ISBN 0-486-61102-7.
31. Jump up^ Michelson, A. A.; Pease, F. G. (1921). “Measurement of the diameter of Alpha Orionis with the interferometer”. Astrophysical Journal. 53: 249–259. Bibcode:1921ApJ….53..249M. doi:10.1086/142603.
32. Jump up^ “” Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia Helena.” CWP”. University of California. Retrieved 2013-02-21.
33. Unsöld, Albrecht (2001). The New Cosmos (5th ed.). New York: Springer. pp. 180–185, 215–216. ISBN 3-540-67877-8.
34. Jump up^ e. g. Battinelli, Paolo; Demers, Serge; Letarte, Bruno (2003). “Carbon Star Survey in the Local Group. V. The Outer Disk of M31”. The Astronomical Journal. 125 (3): 1298–1308. Bibcode:2003AJ….125.1298B. doi:10.1086/346274.
35. Jump up^ “Millennium Star Atlas marks the completion of ESA’s Hipparcos Mission”. ESA. December 8, 1997. Retrieved 2007-08-05.
36. Jump up^ Villard, Ray; Freedman, Wendy L. (October 26, 1994). “Hubble Space Telescope Measures Precise Distance to the Most Remote Galaxy Yet”. Hubble Site. Retrieved 2007-08-05.
37. Jump up^ “Hubble Completes Eight-Year Effort to Measure Expanding Universe”. Hubble Site. May 25, 1999. Retrieved 2007-08-02.
38. Jump up^ “UBC Prof., alumnus discover most distant star clusters: a billion light-years away.”. UBC Public Affairs. January 8, 2007. Retrieved 2015-06-28.
39. Jump up^ Koch-Westenholz, Ulla; Koch, Ulla Susanne (1995). Mesopotamian astrology: an introduction to Babylonian and Assyrian celestial divination. Carsten Niebuhr Institute Publications. 19. Museum Tusculanum Press. p. 163. ISBN 87-7289-287-0.
40. Coleman, Leslie S. “Myths, Legends and Lore”. Frosty Drew Observatory. Retrieved 2012-06-15.
41. Jump up^ “Naming Astronomical Objects”. International Astronomical Union (IAU). Retrieved 2009-01-30.
42. Jump up^ “Naming Stars”. Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS). Retrieved 2009-01-30.
43. Jump up^ Lyall, Francis; Larsen, Paul B. (2009). “Chapter 7: The Moon and Other Celestial Bodies”. Space Law: A Treatise. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 176. ISBN 0-7546-4390-5.
44. Jump up^ “IAU Working Group on Star Names (WGSN)”. Retrieved 22 May 2016.
45. Jump up^ “Star naming”. Scientia Astrophysical Organization. 2005. Retrieved 2010-06-29.
46. Jump up^ “Disclaimer: Name a star, name a rose and other, similar enterprises”. British Library. The British Library Board. Archived from the original on 2010-01-19. Retrieved 2010-06-29.
47. Jump up^ Andersen, Johannes. “Buying Stars and Star Names”. International Astronomical Union. Retrieved 2010-06-24.
48. Jump up^ Pliat, Phil (September–October 2006). “Name Dropping: Want to Be a Star?”. Skeptical Inquirer. 30.5. Retrieved 2010-06-29.
49. Jump up^ Adams, Cecil (April 1, 1998). “Can you pay \$35 to get a star named after you?”. The Straight Dope. Retrieved 2006-08-13.
50. Jump up^ Golden, Frederick; Faflick, Philip (January 11, 1982). “Science: Stellar Idea or Cosmic Scam?”. Times Magazine. Time Inc. Retrieved 2010-06-24.
51. Jump up^ Di Justo, Patrick (December 26, 2001). “Buy a Star, But It’s Not Yours”. Wired. Condé Nast Digital. Retrieved 2010-06-29.
52. Jump up^ Plait, Philip C. (2002). Bad astronomy: misconceptions and misuses revealed, from astrology to the moon landing “hoax”. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 237–240. ISBN 0-471-40976-6.
53. Jump up^ Sclafani, Tom (May 8, 1998). “Consumer Affairs Commissioner Polonetsky Warns Consumers: “Buying A Star Won’t Make You One””. National Astronomy and Ionosphere Center, Aricebo Observatory. Retrieved 2010-06-24.
54. Prsa, A.; Harmanec, P.; Torres, G.; Mamajek, E.; et al. (2016). “Nominal values for selected solar and planetary quantities: IAU 2015 Resolution B3”. Astronomical Journal. 152 (2): 41. arXiv:. Bibcode:2016AJ….152…41P. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41.
55. Jump up^ Woodward, P. R. (1978). “Theoretical models of star formation”. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 16 (1): 555–584. Bibcode:1978ARA&A..16..555W. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.16.090178.003011.
56. Jump up^ Lada, C. J.; Lada, E. A. (2003). “Embedded Clusters in Molecular Clouds”. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 41 (1): 57–115. arXiv:. Bibcode:2003ARA&A..41…57L. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844.
57. Jump up^ Kwok, Sun (2000). The origin and evolution of planetary nebulae. Cambridge astrophysics series. 33. Cambridge University Press. pp. 103–104. ISBN 0-521-62313-8.
58. Adams, Fred C.; Laughlin, Gregory; Graves, Genevieve J. M. “Red Dwarfs and the End of the Main Sequence” (PDF). Gravitational Collapse: From Massive Stars to Planets. Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica. pp. 46–49. Bibcode:2004RMxAC..22…46A. Retrieved 2008-06-24.
59. Jump up^ Elmegreen, B. G.; Lada, C. J. (1977). “Sequential formation of subgroups in OB associations”. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. 214: 725–741. Bibcode:1977ApJ…214..725E. doi:10.1086/155302.
60. Jump up^ Getman, K. V.; et al. (2012). “The Elephant Trunk Nebula and the Trumpler 37 cluster: contribution of triggered star formation to the total population of an H II region”. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 426 (4): 2917–2943. arXiv:. Bibcode:2012MNRAS.426.2917G. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21879.x.
61. Jump up^ Smith, Michael David (2004). The Origin of Stars. Imperial College Press. pp. 57–68. ISBN 1-86094-501-5.
62. Jump up^ Seligman, Courtney. “Slow Contraction of Protostellar Cloud”. Self-published. Archived from the original on 2008-06-23. Retrieved 2006-09-05.
63. Jump up^ Bally, J.; Morse, J.; Reipurth, B. (1996). “The Birth of Stars: Herbig-Haro Jets, Accretion and Proto-Planetary Disks”. In Benvenuti, Piero; Macchetto, F. D.; Schreier, Ethan J. Science with the Hubble Space Telescope – II. Proceedings of a workshop held in Paris, France, December 4–8, 1995. Space Telescope Science Institute. p. 491. Bibcode:1996swhs.conf..491B.
64. Jump up^ Smith, Michael David (2004). The origin of stars. Imperial College Press. p. 176. ISBN 1-86094-501-5.
65. Jump up^ Megeath, Tom (May 11, 2010). “Herschel finds a hole in space”. ESA. Retrieved 2010-05-17.
66. Jump up^ Duquennoy, A.; Mayor, M. (1991). “Multiplicity among solar-type stars in the solar neighbourhood. II – Distribution of the orbital elements in an unbiased sample”. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 248 (2): 485–524. Bibcode:1991A&A…248..485D.
67. Jump up^ Mengel, J. G.; et al. (1979). “Stellar evolution from the zero-age main sequence”. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 40: 733–791. Bibcode:1979ApJS…40..733M. doi:10.1086/190603.
68. Sackmann, I. J.; Boothroyd, A. I.; Kraemer, K. E. (1993). “Our Sun. III. Present and Future”. Astrophysical Journal. 418: 457. Bibcode:1993ApJ…418..457S. doi:10.1086/173407.
69. Jump up^ Wood, B. E.; et al. (2002). “Measured Mass-Loss Rates of Solar-like Stars as a Function of Age and Activity”. The Astrophysical Journal. 574 (1): 412–425. arXiv:. Bibcode:2002ApJ…574..412W. doi:10.1086/340797.
70. Jump up^ de Loore, C.; de Greve, J. P.; Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. (1977). “Evolution of massive stars with mass loss by stellar wind”. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 61 (2): 251–259. Bibcode:1977A&A….61..251D.
71. Jump up^ “The evolution of stars between 50 and 100 times the mass of the Sun”. Royal Greenwich Observatory. Retrieved 2015-11-17.
72. Jump up^ “Main Sequence Lifetime”. Swinburne Astronomy Online Encyclopedia of Astronomy. Swinburne University of Technology.
73. Jump up^ Pizzolato, N.; et al. (2001). “Subphotospheric convection and magnetic activity dependence on metallicity and age: Models and tests”. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 373 (2): 597–607. Bibcode:2001A&A…373..597P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010626.
74. Jump up^ “Mass loss and Evolution”. UCL Astrophysics Group. June 18, 2004. Archived from the original on 2004-11-22. Retrieved 2006-08-26.
75. Jump up^ Schröder, K.-P.; Smith, Robert Connon (2008). “Distant future of the Sun and Earth revisited”. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 386 (1): 155–163. arXiv:. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.386..155S. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13022.x. See also Palmer, Jason (February 22, 2008). “Hope dims that Earth will survive Sun’s death”. NewScientist.com news service. Retrieved 2008-03-24.
76. Jump up^ “The Evolution of Massive Stars and Type II Supernovae”. Penn Stats College of Science. Retrieved 2016-01-05.
77. Jump up^ Sneden, Christopher (February 8, 2001). “Astronomy: The age of the Universe”. Nature. 409 (6821): 673–675. doi:10.1038/35055646. ISSN 0028-0836.
78. Jump up^ Liebert, J. (1980). “White dwarf stars”. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 18 (2): 363–398. Bibcode:1980ARA&A..18..363L. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.002051.
79. “Introduction to Supernova Remnants”. Goddard Space Flight Center. April 6, 2006. Retrieved 2006-07-16.
80. Jump up^ Fryer, C. L. (2003). “Black-hole formation from stellar collapse”. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 20 (10): S73–S80. Bibcode:2003CQGra..20S..73F. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/10/309.
81. Jump up^ “What is a galaxy? How many stars in a galaxy / the Universe?”. Royal Greenwich Observatory. Retrieved 2006-07-18.
82. Jump up^ Borenstein, Seth (December 1, 2010). “Universe’s Star Count Could Triple”. CBS News. Retrieved 2011-07-14.
83. Jump up^ “Hubble Finds Intergalactic Stars”. Hubble News Desk. January 14, 1997. Retrieved 2006-11-06.
84. Jump up^ Szebehely, Victor G.; Curran, Richard B. (1985). Stability of the Solar System and Its Minor Natural and Artificial Bodies. Springer. ISBN 90-277-2046-0.
85. Jump up^ “Most Milky Way Stars Are Single” (Press release). Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. January 30, 2006. Retrieved 2006-07-16.
86. Jump up^ 3.99 × 1013 km / (3 × 104 km/h × 24 × 365.25) = 1.5 × 105 years.
87. Jump up^ Holmberg, J.; Flynn, C. (2000). “The local density of matter mapped by Hipparcos”. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 313 (2): 209–216. arXiv:. Bibcode:2000MNRAS.313..209H. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.02905.x.
88. Jump up^ “Astronomers: Star collisions are rampant, catastrophic”. CNN News. June 2, 2000. Archived from the original on 2007-01-07. Retrieved 2014-01-21.
89. Jump up^ Lombardi, Jr., J. C.; et al. (2002). “Stellar Collisions and the Interior Structure of Blue Stragglers”. The Astrophysical Journal. 568 (2): 939–953. arXiv:. Bibcode:2002ApJ…568..939L. doi:10.1086/339060.
90. H. E. Bond; E. P. Nelan; D. A. VandenBerg; G. H. Schaefer; D. Harmer (2013). “HD 140283: A Star in the Solar Neighborhood that Formed Shortly After the Big Bang”. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 765 (1): L12. arXiv:. Bibcode:2013ApJ…765L..12B. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/L12.
91. Jump up^ Planck Collaboration (2015). “Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters (See Table 4 on page 31 of pfd).”. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 594: A13. arXiv:. Bibcode:2016A&A…594A..13P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830.
92. Jump up^ Naftilan, S. A.; Stetson, P. B. (July 13, 2006). “How do scientists determine the ages of stars? Is the technique really accurate enough to use it to verify the age of the universe?”. Scientific American. Retrieved 2007-05-11.
93. Jump up^ Laughlin, G.; Bodenheimer, P.; Adams, F. C. (1997). “The End of the Main Sequence”. The Astrophysical Journal. 482 (1): 420–432. Bibcode:1997ApJ…482..420L. doi:10.1086/304125.
94. Jump up^ Irwin, Judith A. (2007). Astrophysics: Decoding the Cosmos. John Wiley and Sons. p. 78. ISBN 0-470-01306-0.
95. Jump up^ Fischer, D. A.; Valenti, J. (2005). “The Planet-Metallicity Correlation”. The Astrophysical Journal. 622 (2): 1102–1117. Bibcode:2005ApJ…622.1102F. doi:10.1086/428383.
96. Jump up^ “Signatures Of The First Stars”. ScienceDaily. April 17, 2005. Retrieved 2006-10-10.
97. Jump up^ Feltzing, S.; Gonzalez, G. (2000). “The nature of super-metal-rich stars: Detailed abundance analysis of 8 super-metal-rich star candidates”. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 367 (1): 253–265. Bibcode:2001A&A…367..253F. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000477.
98. Jump up^ Gray, David F. (1992). The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres. Cambridge University Press. pp. 413–414. ISBN 0-521-40868-7.
99. Jump up^ Jørgensen, Uffe G. (1997), “Cool Star Models”, in van Dishoeck, Ewine F., Molecules in Astrophysics: Probes and Processes, International Astronomical Union Symposia. Molecules in Astrophysics: Probes and Processes, 178, Springer Science & Business Media, p. 446, ISBN 079234538X
100. Jump up^ “The Biggest Star in the Sky”. ESO. March 11, 1997. Retrieved 2006-07-10.
101. Jump up^ Ragland, S.; Chandrasekhar, T.; Ashok, N. M. (1995). “Angular Diameter of Carbon Star Tx-Piscium from Lunar Occultation Observations in the Near Infrared”. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy. 16: 332. Bibcode:1995JApAS..16..332R.
102. Jump up^ Davis, Kate (December 1, 2000). “Variable Star of the Month—December, 2000: Alpha Orionis”. AAVSO. Archived from the original on 2006-07-12. Retrieved 2006-08-13.
103. Jump up^ Loktin, A. V. (September 2006). “Kinematics of stars in the Pleiades open cluster”. Astronomy Reports. 50 (9): 714–721. Bibcode:2006ARep…50..714L. doi:10.1134/S1063772906090058.
104. Jump up^ “Hipparcos: High Proper Motion Stars”. ESA. September 10, 1999. Retrieved 2006-10-10.
105. Jump up^ Johnson, Hugh M. (1957). “The Kinematics and Evolution of Population I Stars”. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 69 (406): 54. Bibcode:1957PASP…69…54J. doi:10.1086/127012.
106. Jump up^ Elmegreen, B.; Efremov, Y. N. (1999). “The Formation of Star Clusters”. American Scientist. 86 (3): 264. Bibcode:1998AmSci..86..264E. doi:10.1511/1998.3.264. Archived from the original on March 23, 2005. Retrieved 2006-08-23.
107. Jump up^ Brainerd, Jerome James (July 6, 2005). “X-rays from Stellar Coronas”. The Astrophysics Spectator. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
108. Jump up^ Berdyugina, Svetlana V. (2005). “Starspots: A Key to the Stellar Dynamo”. Living Reviews. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
109. Jump up^ Smith, Nathan (1998). “The Behemoth Eta Carinae: A Repeat Offender”. Mercury Magazine. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 27: 20. Retrieved 2006-08-13.
110. Jump up^ Weidner, C.; Kroupa, P. (February 11, 2004). “Evidence for a fundamental stellar upper mass limit from clustered star formation” (PDF). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 348 (1): 187–191. arXiv:. Bibcode:2004MNRAS.348..187W. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07340.x. ISSN 0035-8711.
111. Jump up^ Hainich, R.; Rühling, U.; Todt, H.; Oskinova, L. M.; Liermann, A.; Gräfener, G.; Foellmi, C.; Schnurr, O.; Hamann, W. -R. (2014). “The Wolf-Rayet stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud”. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 565: A27. arXiv:. Bibcode:2014A&A…565A..27H. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322696.
112. Jump up^ Banerjee, Sambaran; Kroupa, Pavel; Oh, Seungkyung (October 21, 2012). “The emergence of super-canonical stars in R136-type starburst clusters”. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 426 (2): 1416–1426. arXiv:. Bibcode:2012MNRAS.426.1416B. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21672.x. ISSN 0035-8711.
113. Jump up^ “Ferreting Out The First Stars”. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. September 22, 2005. Retrieved 2006-09-05.
114. Jump up^ Sobral, David; Matthee, Jorryt; Darvish, Behnam; Schaerer, Daniel; Mobasher, Bahram; Röttgering, Huub J. A.; Santos, Sérgio; Hemmati, Shoubaneh (4 June 2015). “Evidence For POPIII-Like Stellar Populations In The Most Luminous LYMAN-α Emitters At The Epoch Of Re-Ionisation: Spectroscopic Confirmation”. The Astrophysical Journal. 808: 139. arXiv:. Bibcode:2015ApJ…808..139S. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/139.
115. Jump up^ Overbye, Dennis (17 June 2015). “Astronomers Report Finding Earliest Stars That Enriched Cosmos”. New York Times. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
116. Jump up^ “2MASS J05233822-1403022”. SIMBAD – Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
117. Jump up^ Boss, Alan (April 3, 2001). “Are They Planets or What?”. Carnegie Institution of Washington. Archived from the original on 2006-09-28. Retrieved 2006-06-08.
118. Shiga, David (August 17, 2006). “Mass cut-off between stars and brown dwarfs revealed”. New Scientist. Archived from the original on 2006-11-14. Retrieved 2006-08-23.
119. Jump up^ Leadbeater, Elli (August 18, 2006). “Hubble glimpses faintest stars”. BBC. Retrieved 2006-08-22.
120. Jump up^ “Flattest Star Ever Seen”. ESO. June 11, 2003. Retrieved 2006-10-03.
121. Jump up^ Fitzpatrick, Richard (February 13, 2006). “Introduction to Plasma Physics: A graduate course”. The University of Texas at Austin. Archived from the original on 2010-01-04. Retrieved 2006-10-04.
122. Jump up^ Villata, Massimo (1992). “Angular momentum loss by a stellar wind and rotational velocities of white dwarfs”. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 257 (3): 450–454. Bibcode:1992MNRAS.257..450V. doi:10.1093/mnras/257.3.450.
123. Jump up^ “A History of the Crab Nebula”. ESO. May 30, 1996. Retrieved 2006-10-03.
124. Jump up^ Strobel, Nick (August 20, 2007). “Properties of Stars: Color and Temperature”. Astronomy Notes. Primis/McGraw-Hill, Inc. Archived from the original on 2007-06-26. Retrieved 2007-10-09.
125. Jump up^ Seligman, Courtney. “Review of Heat Flow Inside Stars”. Self-published. Retrieved 2007-07-05.
126. “Main Sequence Stars”. The Astrophysics Spectator. February 16, 2005. Retrieved 2006-10-10.
127. Jump up^ Zeilik, Michael A.; Gregory, Stephan A. (1998). Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics (4th ed.). Saunders College Publishing. p. 321. ISBN 0-03-006228-4.
128. Jump up^ Koppes, Steve (June 20, 2003). “University of Chicago physicist receives Kyoto Prize for lifetime achievements in science”. The University of Chicago News Office. Retrieved 2012-06-15.
129. Jump up^ “The Colour of Stars”. Australian Telescope Outreach and Education. Retrieved 2006-08-13.
130. Jump up^ “Astronomers Measure Mass of a Single Star—First Since the Sun”. Hubble News Desk. July 15, 2004. Retrieved 2006-05-24.
131. Jump up^ Garnett, D. R.; Kobulnicky, H. A. (2000). “Distance Dependence in the Solar Neighborhood Age-Metallicity Relation”. The Astrophysical Journal. 532 (2): 1192–1196. arXiv:. Bibcode:2000ApJ…532.1192G. doi:10.1086/308617.
132. Jump up^ Staff (January 10, 2006). “Rapidly Spinning Star Vega has Cool Dark Equator”. National Optical Astronomy Observatory. Retrieved 2007-11-18.
133. Jump up^ Michelson, A. A.; Pease, F. G. (2005). “Starspots: A Key to the Stellar Dynamo”. Living Reviews in Solar Physics. Max Planck Society.
134. Jump up^ Manduca, A.; Bell, R. A.; Gustafsson, B. (1977). “Limb darkening coefficients for late-type giant model atmospheres”. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 61 (6): 809–813. Bibcode:1977A&A….61..809M.
135. Jump up^ Chugainov, P. F. (1971). “On the Cause of Periodic Light Variations of Some Red Dwarf Stars”. Information Bulletin on Variable Stars. 520: 1–3. Bibcode:1971IBVS..520….1C.
136. Jump up^ “Magnitude”. National Solar Observatory—Sacramento Peak. Archived from the original on 2008-02-06. Retrieved 2006-08-23.
137. “Luminosity of Stars”. Australian Telescope Outreach and Education. Retrieved 2006-08-13.
138. Jump up^ Hoover, Aaron (January 15, 2004). “Star may be biggest, brightest yet observed”. HubbleSite. Archived from the original on 2007-08-07. Retrieved 2006-06-08.
139. Jump up^ “Faintest Stars in Globular Cluster NGC 6397”. HubbleSite. August 17, 2006. Retrieved 2006-06-08.
140. Jump up^ Smith, Gene (April 16, 1999). “Stellar Spectra”. University of California, San Diego. Retrieved 2006-10-12.
141. Jump up^ Fowler, A. (February 1891). “The Draper Catalogue of Stellar Spectra”. Nature. 45: 427–8. Bibcode:1892Natur..45..427F. doi:10.1038/045427a0.
142. Jump up^ Jaschek, Carlos; Jaschek, Mercedes (1990). The Classification of Stars. Cambridge University Press. pp. 31–48. ISBN 0-521-38996-8.
143. MacRobert, Alan M. “The Spectral Types of Stars”. Sky and Telescope. Retrieved 2006-07-19.
144. Jump up^ “White Dwarf (wd) Stars”. White Dwarf Research Corporation. Archived from the original on 2009-10-08. Retrieved 2006-07-19.
145. “Types of Variable”. AAVSO. May 11, 2010. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
146. Jump up^ “Cataclysmic Variables”. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. 2004-11-01. Retrieved 2006-06-08.
147. Jump up^ Hansen, Carl J.; Kawaler, Steven D.; Trimble, Virginia (2004). Stellar Interiors. Springer. pp. 32–33. ISBN 0-387-20089-4.
148. Schwarzschild, Martin (1958). Structure and Evolution of the Stars. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-08044-5.
149. Jump up^ “Formation of the High Mass Elements”. Smoot Group. Retrieved 2006-07-11.
150. “What is a Star?”. NASA. 2006-09-01. Retrieved 2006-07-11.
151. Jump up^ “The Glory of a Nearby Star: Optical Light from a Hot Stellar Corona Detected with the VLT” (Press release). ESO. August 1, 2001. Retrieved 2006-07-10.
152. Jump up^ Burlaga, L. F.; et al. (2005). “Crossing the Termination Shock into the Heliosheath: Magnetic Fields”. Science. 309 (5743): 2027–2029. Bibcode:2005Sci…309.2027B. doi:10.1126/science.1117542. PMID 16179471.
153. Wallerstein, G.; et al. (1999). “Synthesis of the elements in stars: forty years of progress” (PDF). Reviews of Modern Physics. 69 (4): 995–1084. Bibcode:1997RvMP…69..995W. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.69.995. Retrieved 2006-08-04.
154. Jump up^ Girardi, L.; Bressan, A.; Bertelli, G.; Chiosi, C. (2000). “Evolutionary tracks and isochrones for low- and intermediate-mass stars: From 0.15 to 7 Msun, and from Z=0.0004 to 0.03″. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement. 141 (3): 371–383. arXiv:. Bibcode:2000A&AS..141..371G. doi:10.1051/aas:2000126.
155. Jump up^ Woosley, S. E.; Heger, A.; Weaver, T. A. (2002). “The evolution and explosion of massive stars”. Reviews of Modern Physics. 74 (4): 1015–1071. Bibcode:2002RvMP…74.1015W. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1015.
156. Jump up^ 11.5 days is 0.0315 years.